Jump to content
RockWare Support Forum


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About JuDi

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi Molly, I am working with Wenli on the same database. I checked 1) and 2). Looks all fine. It is weird, because the logs are plotted for other wells, only one is showing the data in one spot, see well 3. in the image: As Wenli states, the issue only shows when checking 'use true vertical depth' I also recalculated the xyz values for that log in question again. Any other hint what to check?
  2. Hi, a little late here for the original post I guess. But since I had the same question. I wanted to share what helped me to get five-spot sample: Based on recommendations in this post on the tough forum, I set the initial fraction of tracer to 0.01 in the reservoir and only injected tracer (no water). Thus I see in the resulting plots how the injected water moves away from the injection well. Julia
  3. Msayed, a workflow that works for me quite good (not sure if you can apply with the FEM software you are using) Generate the mesh in the GUI of the FEM software Export gridpoints or center points import into RW using: RockWorks | Utilities | File | Import | Text run the residuals on 3D solid model you have in RW using: RockWorks | Utilities | Solid | Statistics | Residuals import the info now mapped to the grid/centerpoint of your grid to the FEM mesh Cheers, Julia
  4. Hi, it'd be great to see that feature. It's been out there for a while, see similar discussion a while ago. Cheers, Julia
  5. I am wondering if anyone can suggest a best practice for keeping track of well construction changes in the database. One idea I had was to copy the well bore each time the completion changes. but that also means duplicating any log (P-) data, thus would necessarily duplicate data in the database. So ideally it would be only one well bore entry, but a possibility to go back in time for different completion setups. (e.g. adding removing gauges, deepening of a well, ....) Any other ideas out there, input appreciated. Thanks, Julia
  6. Hi Tom, that's useful information here. interesting is that if I use "EZ-map" the triangulation works fine with the data set. Only when using "Grid-Based" map, I need to decluster. Does "EZ-map" decluster automatically? Regards, Julia
  7. Hi, what is the fastest way to add a proper color legend when plotting P-data with disks and option 'Cold--> Hot colors' (see image) in 3D? I assume the value range I have to get from min/max of the P-data values. but which color scheme is used for visualization, 2-colors or 3-colors? what are the starting/ending colors? Best regards, Julia
  8. Hi Tom, thanks. True for horizontal wells that makes no sense. Julia
  9. Alison, thanks. In the end reducing the grids to below 10,000 grid points help speed up the process quite a bit. (It made the grids less smooth, but it was still ok for the model) Julia
  10. Hi, when running RockWorks | Borehole Manager | StripLogs | Borehole Survey the "Depth Incrementation/Resolution" refers to measured depth, right? Is there a way in Rockworks to resample this result then into constant elevation interval? Or better, get the survey at constant elevation intervals from the beginning? Thanks, Julia
  11. Hi, does anyone have experience with performance of loading files when creating layers? I am working with XYZ files, that have ~60,000 points and the loading takes more than five minutes. Would dxf or contour be faster? Do "internal boundaries" already in the model have an effect on the speed of loading? Tips or tricks how to speed up the loading process are appreciated. Thanks, Julia
  12. I see that the color bar changes when choosing "Logarithmic Scale" for a plot. Is there a way to keep color bar and adjust the labels to logarithmic increments? Thanks, Julia
  13. TVD plots within RW have been discussed for a while now. (see e.g. here). So I agree with Edward, it'd be great to have such feature in RW. :-) Regarding the issue of wells starting from the same location: I used Brian's suggestion once, that works fine. Though it can be tedious in case you have a lot of boreholes, to zoom in to the selection map. Would providing a drop down list for boreholes to show in section view be an option for that? E.g. when the user chooses to visualize bore holes with uniform borehole spacing.
  • Create New...