I wonder if there are hidden problems between 2D log and 3D log. Here is one of the example:
The stratigraphic legend in my project should be (Fill>BD>MD>Coll>All>Sap) from top to bottom. Some of the logs reach the bottom layer and some of them are too shallow to reach Sap.
I put in the stratigraphy of one borehole (BH1) like this:
I found that one layer (All) is missing in the 2D plot, but it is observable in the 3D plot.
So I wonder if there are some discrepancies in running the 2D plot and 3D plot.
I know that this problem maybe due to the blank row for the Sap layer, as I found that the 2D plot appears to have no problem when I delete the last blank row. But I wonder if there is some problem for the interpolation of section/profile when the empty row is deleted.
Also, I just wonder if there are hidden problems between 2D and 3D plots/profiles as the plots/profile are generated seperately ( i.e. the 2D plots/profiles are not directly extract from the 3D model.),
Thank you very much.