Jump to content
RockWare Support Forum


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About mgaud

  • Rank
  1. Molly, Thanks! Downloading the latest version was the solution -- I was using the June '05 version, but the Jan '06 corrected the problem. -- Michael
  2. Here's the error I get: GENERAL:UTM_DECIMALS integer setting is undefined ... but I have set the decimal places as recommended in the help dialog (=6). After I click "OK" it fills in my lat and long columns with incorrect values, and with a precision to only single degrees (not very useful). I also tried making the conversion by scripting with RCL. This time I got the blue progress bar (encouraging), no error (still encouraging), but no results. If I try the reverse, lat-long to UTM, that calculation seems to have no problem. Am I doing something wrong? Is this a bug? Thanks in advance for any help.
  3. Molly, This solved my problem. Thank you. -- Michael
  4. Mitch, your suggestions have helped me out a lot. Yes, I have several sections, of a variety of lengths. Here's how I am able to keep sizes of fonts and boring-log widths constant from cross-section to cross-section. 1) keep constant the sizes of fonts and log widths 2) vary the User-Defined Project Size and the Printing Scale together -- for example: - For a long cross-section, I specified the User-Defined Project Size as 100, and the Printing Scale as 1 in. = 200 units - For a short cross-section, approx. 1/4 as long as the long one, I specified the User-Defined Project Size as 25 and the Printing Scale as 1 in. = 50 units -- Michael
  5. I have unintended vertical offsets at the bends in my cross-sections. This seems to happen regardless of the angle of the bend, or whether or not there's a bore-hole log at the bend. The offset is not consistent between different stratigraphic units or between bends. Why might I be getting these offsets? How do I avoid this problem? I am using the Modeled Section under the Stratigraphy menu (RW 2004). There's an example of my problem in the tutorial for this tool (last image, left circle). Thanks for any help. -- Michael
  6. I'm having a hard time making my cross-sections look consistent, because it's so cumbersome to specify sizes for fonts, widths of logs, etc. Are the sizes of things really calculated as a percentage of the study-area width, as I recall reading somewhere? If so, which width (N-S or E-W)? Are some sizes calculated as a percentage of page size? I'm hoping someone can suggest an efficient way to keep the sizes consistent from section to section -- a size of 0.04 is too small in some instances, and too big in others. Thanks for any help.
  • Create New...