Jump to content
RockWare Support Forum

Brianna

Members
  • Content Count

    44
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Brianna

  1. Msayed, What program are you using and what kind of format are you in need of? Why would the center of the voxels be sufficient? Since the RockWorks model is regularly spaced and uniform, wouldn't the center of the nodes be the "same" as the corners? I would think it would only be different if the discretization of the grid was variable?
  2. Thanks for this question Chris. If you want to have uniform thickness across faults, you have to add in some control. RockWorks needs to create a grid across the entire project area. This includes above ground where the units may have eroded away. You need to approach your project with a couple of things in mind: your geology is a result of multiple events and you will need to construct the stratigraphy model in the same way. I would recommend creating a grid surface of your alluvium on its own first. This gives you a known thickness of alluvium across the site. The bo
  3. Hi Abby, I'm not exactly sure what it is you're looking to do. Could you draw out what you want to do and send it to support@rockware.com Then I'll be able to come up with some suggestions if it's possible to do.
  4. You can plot up stereonets and a variety of maps showing strucutral data, but we do not have anything pertaining to safety factors and failure prediction. Here are the options in the "Planes" category.
  5. The Single table import was broken since the last build because of some internal changes to the program. We have a fix and we should be releasing this fixed version later today. Sorry for any inconvenience.
  6. Jeremy, I can help you out with this if you send your project data to support@rockware.com. Without seeing what's happening it is hard to say specifically what the issue is. Cheers, Brian
  7. Chris, Unfortunately in LogPlot7 this is not possible. Look for this feature in the next version of LogPlot coming soon.
  8. You can assign the vertical units to meters or feet when you create your project. You may not have switched that to feet when you created the project. You can reassign the units from the Settings/Coordinates/Reassign coordinate system and/or units without changing actual data
  9. Josh, The legend text is directly proportional to the size of the legend itself so by making the legend larger the text will get larger. Otherwise there is no direct way to change the size. Another indirect way would be to change the other dimensions in the legend to make more space for the text... so change the margins or the cell width.
  10. Craig, All boreholes that are input to the borehole manager need to have at least the following data fields: Easting Northing Z Elevation Collar Elevation Total Depth The Z elevation is the ground surface elevation. The collar elevation is an alternative elevation, typically above or below the ground surface, that might be used as a measuring point for water levels. If you don't have this information, you can use the Z Elevation. If you are having trouble importing from Excel, you can paste your values into the Utilities data sheet and transfer the values to the borehole manager using the
  11. Craig, Check to see if your project dimensions are set properly so that your boreholes are within the project bounds. Generally, if the project dimensions are outside the borehole locations, it may appear that your boreholes are not showing up.
  12. Josh, Unfortunately we don't have any 3D clipping tools. What I would suggest is using either ARC 3D or AutoCad to clip it prior to importing it. I'm going to put this feature on the list for the developers for a future version.
  13. Josch, The method you are using to produce your grid surface will dictate how long it will take. More complex calculations will add time. When I generated a map from your data I used triangulation because it was a large set. I just ran Easy Map (which uses triangulation) and it took about 4 minutes. You can certainly do what you are wanting to do but you will need to think about your resolution of the model. A model space that is 200km2 is vary large. It's certainly fine, it's all about scaling. If you want to use your 50m DEM you would need to make your model in 50m spacing and that would
  14. This is a pretty large data set so you will want to load the file to make the grid instead of using the data sheet. I would stay away from using Local Coordinates, The maps you make here are small scale and UTM is much better for that. Here's what I did to make a map from your data: Be sure you make your project in UTM zone 32 (I used x/y and z meters) load your data to the datasheet convert the Lat/lon to UTM zone 32 You can scan the datasheet to get your model dimensions at this point based on the UTM export the data to a text file Load the text file using Map-> Gridbased map-> b
  15. It seems that the issue was coming from data issues. I think you have it worked out now.
  16. Josh, It turns out that the "Replace Nulls" was causing your issue. Turn that off and you should be good. We will work on a fix for that in an upcoming version. Brian
  17. Schelhorn, I took a look at your file and I noticed a few things. First question I have is if you are importing this into the database or into the Utilities data sheet? Your data is in this format: "d"; "xcoord_UTM[degree]"; "ycoord_UTM[degree]"; "elevation[m] "1";1.2345 ; 23.4567 ; 123 Your data is mixed with quoted text and float values. Ideally, you don't need to have quotes in your text. Having the quotes may cause issues if you want to import the data into the database. Cleaning this data up ahead of time is a good idea if you can. The
  18. It seems that the smoothing is messing things up. It's probably a bug introduced recently in a fix, so in the meantime, turn off smoothing and you should be good.
  19. Can you send me your surface grid file at support@rockware.com ?
  20. To copy one grid the another, you would just copy the one grid in the Windows file manager and change the name to the other file. Be sure to make a copy of the file you are replacing before overwriting the file.
  21. Josh, As I mentioned in the email to you, you should check the depths of your data. Looking at one borehole I can see that your stratigraphy data goes from 6.95-35 and your I-data starts at 1.9 and goes to 12 Clearly there's not much overlap and the data may appear to be above the stratigraphy.
  22. Josh, Your files were not attached. Please send them to tech@rockware.com and I'll take a look at what you have. Brian
  23. Josh, The RockPlot3D and RockPlot2D files are viewable in both RockWorks16 and RockWorks17. Even if someone does not have a license for RockWorks, they can download the demo version which is a viewer for the 2D and 3D files even after the trial period is over. Brian
  24. Manojhatta, You can draw your own polygon or use a shapefile as a clipping boundary for your model. Once you have loaded your polygon to either a polygon table in RockWorks, or using an rwDat file, you can assign the polygon to the model options using the Polygon check box in the "Additional Options" portion of the solid modeling options. Save your polygon to a polygon table by right clicking on the polygon in RockPlot2D and use the Save to Polygon Table option. This will give you access to this polygon throughout RockWorks. In addition to polygon restriction, you can restrict a model by di
  25. Anu, If RockWorks is giving you an error with a bug report, please send it to tech@rockware.com so we can better analyze the issue. For your vertical exaggeration problem, it would be much easier for us to help fix your problem if we had your data and a screen shot of your result. Please send these to tech@rockware.com and we can help you fix your issue. Brian
×
×
  • Create New...