Jump to content
RockWare Support Forum

Reso

Members
  • Content count

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Reso


  1. Thanks Molly

    that way i have used so far

    but i have a big file around 25000 raws ( in exel) and is very painfull to transform them as rockwork location needs them or to copy and past

    Kind regards Reso

    By the way i woild like to express my high consideration to you, you are helpfull, prompt and very polite every time that i have something to ask. Thanks one more time


  2. volum_calc.bmpHi

    When I tried to calculate volume (for this test file that I know what volume is) I have different numbers: from stratigrafig model volume is 75628 and from idata model volume is 52500, the expected volume should be round 73000 (one zoom view of dh results(bar grapfs), stratimodel (top and base of ore body in pink) and zn model(blue color) together is included in the file question volume) Why is this difference in the thickness of interpolation as you see in the file?

    Any user guide for Rockworks 2006

    If you have any advise on these problems I will appreciate very much Regards Reso


  3. Hi

    When I tried to calculate volume (for this test file that I know what volume is) I have different numbers: from stratigrafig model volume is 75628 and from idata model volume is 52500, the expected volume should be round 73000 (one zoom view of dh results(bar grapfs), stratimodel (top and base of ore body in pink) and zn model(blue color) together is included in the file question volume) Why is this difference in the thickness of interpolation as you see in the file?

    Any user guide for Rockworks 2006

    If you have any advise on these problems I will appreciate very much Regards Reso


  4. Hi

    if any one can help me on this question i will appreciate very much

    when i convert ore thickness to grid base on the boolean model contours are not cntinous and crossing each other (see attached file)

    If i do the same thing based on original model not on boolean model i have graph that i like very much but the range is strange (0-1275 ????) and is very different from the factic thickness range (0-365 m ) or Zn % range (0-34%). What is this ?

    Any way that i can draw a graph of thickness x content (m%) that meand meter percentage

    Kind regards

    Reso

    post-113-1137545112.jpg


  5. Hi Mitch

    Thanks for your replay, I have not any problem how to filter proven, probable and inferred but what i mean was : how can i filter/classify,average/group each of them based on content (Zn % in my case). For example proven reserves are 100 ton average 6%zn and i want to group them as resourses 0-3%,3-4%, 4-7%Zn:(to have a kind of result like this{ 70 t with 7%,20 t 3% and 10 ton with 4%): the same for probable and inferred? any easy way for that ?

    Kind regards

    Reso


  6. Hi Mitch

    Thanks for your replay, I have not any problem how to filter proven probable and inferred but what i mean was : how can i filter. classify, average, and group based on different content (Zn % in my case) each of them. For example proven reserves are 100 ton average 6%zn (composed 70 t with 7%,20 t 3% and 10 ton with 4%): the same for probable and inferred? any easy way for that ?

    Kind regards

    Reso


  7. Hi

    Any way that i can "pick" a point between two dh, that means one drill hoel has a formation the other has not and i want to interpolate grafically a point between them, to show that here this formation ends. (top and base are converge in one point, thickness is zero)

    Regards

    Reso

×